Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal

This article offers a detailed critique of the third Millennium Development Goal (MDG3), which focuses on promoting gender equality and empowering women. The author examines what “empowerment” truly means and questions whether the indicators used under MDG3—education, employment, and political representation—are sufficient to capture the complexity of women’s lived realities and the structural conditions shaping gender inequality.

The analysis argues that women’s empowerment cannot be reduced to improvements in basic indicators alone. While access to schooling, paid work, or public office can expand opportunities, they do not automatically translate into empowerment if social norms, power relations, and institutional barriers remain unchanged. Instead, the author proposes a more holistic approach that views empowerment as the expansion of people’s capacity to make strategic choices — rooted in three interlinked dimensions: resources (access to assets and opportunities), agency (the ability to define goals and act on them), and achievements (the outcomes that reflect real change in people’s lives).

The article stresses that meaningful equality requires transforming the wider structural forces that limit women’s autonomy — including discriminatory norms, legal systems, labour structures, and household dynamics. It encourages policymakers, practitioners, and organisations to move beyond narrow metrics and focus on long-term social change, grounded in dignity, agency, and equitable power relations.

Reference:Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal — Naila Kabeer (2005) https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/media/0589/Kabeer%25202005.pdf

Kabeer_202005.pdf

Download PDF • 973KB